Labour Market in the Czech Republic
Methodology | Contents |
On 1 January 2000, a new territorial structure of the Czech Republic, dividing the country into 14 Regions (“higher territorial administrative units”), became effective based on Constitutional Act No. 347/97 Coll. In this context and for statistical and analytical needs, as well as for the needs of the European Commission, eight statistical territorial units (Areas) were defined within the Czech Republic in compliance with the Resolution of Cabinet of the CR No. 707/1998. The new territorial structure of the Czech Republic, which complies with the system of NUTS (La Nomenclature des Unités Territoriales Statistiques) used in the EU member countries, can be seen from the attached maps. The above mentioned fact was a stimulus for preparing the publication of historical data in the new administrative arrangement in order to describe a longer period of development in the particular region. Therefore it contains views on the labour market at all basic levels, i.e. NUTS1 - the Czech Republic, but especially NUTS2 - statistical areas and NUTS3 - regions. Data for those NUTS2 which are the same as NUTS3 are stated only once.
The LFSS is conducted among respondents living in dwellings chosen at random. All characteristics of every respondent are related to his/her position in the reference week. This allows to track all the population groups and judge their position on the labour market in terms of age, gender, education, branch of industry, status in employment, mobility of labour force, social status and the like. Compared with current accounting and other register sources, LFSS allows to make an expert guess of not only the level and character of employment and total unemployment from various aspects, but also the scope and character of economic inactivity of the population.
The LFSS targets households living in dwellings chosen at random. All persons living in a sampled dwelling continuously for a minimum of 3 months are subject to the LFSS and it is neither decisive nor monitored whether their stay there is permanent, temporary, long-term or registered. The LFSS does not cover persons living in collective accommodation establishments for a long time. Temporary members of the armed forces, who are measured at the place of their residence before they commence their military service, are an exception. Data measured in persons younger than 15 are basic only: relation to the head of household (HOH), age, sex, and nationality. Persons over 15 answer questions which describe their involvement in the labour market.
The panel of chosen dwellings is varied during the survey. Each quarter sees 20% of newly chosen dwellings incorporated into the panel and these are then discarded out of the panel after five quarters. The sample size in the initial three years of the survey was almost 23 thousand dwellings. After reinforcing a sample in the largest districts the sample size amounted to 26 thousand chosen dwelling units on the territory of the Czech Republic - about 0.7% of all dwellings permanently occupied. Nowadays the sample size reaches cca 24 thousand dwellings while almost 65 thousand respondents of all age groups are measured in these dwellings every quarter, of which approximately 54 thousand respondents are aged 15 or more.
The whole databases were corrected in the framework of the preparation of historical data so that differences arising from the development of the survey proper could be removed and the databases could be compared with one another. The characteristics which could not be completely methodically unified in time are described in chapter Development of methodology of the indicators and characteristics of their changes.
These corrections were focussed on the following in particular:
- removal of differences in reference periods: all data for 1993 to 1997, when the survey was taken in seasonal quarters, were converted to calendar quarters;
- inclusion of information, according to administrative sources, on temporary members of the armed forces in the initial two years of the survey and dividing women on maternity leave and additional child-care leave (not measured in the two initial years);
- methodological unification of indicators to the methodology in force since 1998;
- re-weighting of 1993-1996 data retrospectively to final demography.
The above-mentioned facts suggest that it is not possible to use time series data and data continuously released in 1993 to 1997 at the same time. Should a need to have another view of the history of the labour market in the Czech Republic arise, the Czech Statistical Office should be contacted.